Dominant Adam Wainwright Showing Elbow Scare Was Just a Bump in the Road

The St. Louis Cardinals have reasons to worry about a number of their pitchers these days, which is all sorts of bad news.

But there's good news, too: In his last two trips to the hill, Adam Wainwright has made it clear there's nothing to worry about on his end. 

On Thursday night at Dodger Stadium, Wainwright made his second start since being sidelined for 10 days with right elbow soreness earlier this month. He ultimately found himself on the short end of a 1-0 Los Angeles Dodgers victory, but that had more to do with Josh Beckett's seven scoreless innings than Wainwright's own pitching.

The veteran right-hander fired eight innings of one-run ball, giving up five hits and a walk while striking out seven. It looked for a time like Wainwright was going to do a lot better than that, as it took a leadoff single by Miguel Rojas in the sixth inning to break up his run at a no-hitter. 

Put everything together, and Wainwright's second start back since his injury hiatus looked a lot like his first start back:

That kind of efficient dominance has been the norm for Wainwright for a while now, and this latest effort makes 18 starts of at least eight innings since 2013. That's more than anybody else in baseball.

Wainwright has helped his ERA in the process. It was 2.15 when his elbow started barking. It's now 2.01, second-best behind only Johnny Cueto among qualified National League pitchers.

There's the gospel of the results for you. After a brief bump in the road, Adam Wainwright is Adam Wainwright again.

And no, it's not just the results that say so.

If there's one gripe you can raise about Wainwright's last two starts, it's that he hasn't quite been the strike-throwing machine that he was before. Only 66 percent of his pitches have been strikes, whereas 67 percent of his pitches were going for strikes before.

Dude's slacking, man. I guess that makes it a good thing he's had some good stuff.

He's certainly had good velocity. Straight from Brooks Baseball, here's the relevant data:

It's not a clean sweep, but Wainwright has generally been throwing harder since his return from injury than he was before. That's a pretty good sign that his elbow is not only feeling good, but that he's comfortable enough to push it.

Even more encouraging is that Wainwright hasn't been shying away from his trademark curveball either. In his first 14 starts, he threw his curveball 25.3 percent of the time. In his first start back, his hook accounted for 26 of his 104 pitches. Against the Dodgers, it accounted for 27 of his 100 pitches.

That's 53 of 204, or 26.0 percent. Rather than go down a tick, Wainwright's curveball usage has gone up a tick.

And Uncle Charles is still as snappy as he's ever been, thank you very much. Maybe even snappier.

Whereas 16.9 percent of Wainwright's curves drew whiffs in his first 14 starts, 30.2 percent (16 of 53) of his curves have gotten whiffs since his return. And since said curve looked especially good in picking up the bulk of those whiffs (10) Thursday night, I have to agree with's Matt Snyder:

This would be how Wainwright has gotten his Wainwright-like results his last two times out. He's been able to throw strikes, he's had good life on his fastball, and his money-making curve is in top form.

All of this is worthy of a bigger sigh of relief than you might think. The elbow injury Wainwright came down with didn't sideline him for long, but it was concerning all the same.

This is a guy who already had Tommy John surgery in 2011, after all. And though his injury was described as being similar to "tennis elbow," he didn't make it out to be any kind of minor inconvenience. He was in real pain.

"The game in Tampa Bay [on June 10], even though I had decent results, that didn't feel good at all," Wainwright told's Alex M. Smith. "It hurt. We got all that calmed down."

Given the pain Wainwright was dealing with and the impressive fashion in which he's bounced back from it, you do get the sense that the Cardinals have dodged a bullet.

And it's a good thing they have.

The Cardinals began the season with a strong starting rotation, but sophomore right-hander Michael Wacha and oft-injured left-hander Jaime Garcia were placed on the disabled list a few days back. Right-hander Joe Kelly was already there waiting for them, and fellow right-hander Shelby Miller only lasted a couple innings in his most recent start before his back acted up on him.

With so many injuries all of a sudden, these are tough times for St. Louis' starting rotation. If the Cardinals didn't have Wainwright healthy and firing on all cylinders, their pursuit of the NL Central-leading Milwaukee Brewers would be very much in danger of hitting a serious snag.

But the Cardinals do have a healthy Wainwright, and he is firing on all cylinders. That means that every fifth day is going to be a good day.

And as long as that's the case, they'll be sticking around.


Note: Stats courtesy of unless otherwise noted/linked. 


If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter

Read more MLB news on

Bleacher Report’s Full 2014 Midseason MLB Awards

The 2014 Major League Baseball season is (more or less) at the halfway point. Having already taken a look at some super-interesting statistical happenings, we shall now pursue another midseason activity: handing out awards.

We'll obviously be including the big onesRookies of the Year, Cy Youngs, MVPs, etc.—as a midseason awards show just wouldn't be complete without them. But in the interests of due diligence, science and good, old-fashioned fun for the whole family, we have some other awards to hand out too.

Better strap yourselves in. We have a lot of awards to get to.

And remember, there's no arguing the selections unless you feel like it.

Begin Slideshow

Tim Lincecum’s No-Hitter Shows He’s Still Capable of Occasional Magic

Tim Lincecum could dazzle with the best of 'em between 2008 and 2011. But then the baseball gods took his powers away in 2012, dooming most of his trips to the mound to be a struggle.

But then there are those other times. Those times when, even if it's often just for a moment, Lincecum gets his powers back.

Like what happened Wednesday afternoon. Lincecum did it again.

Specifically, the San Francisco Giants right-hander did it again to the San Diego Padres, no-hitting them at AT&T Park almost a year after he no-hit them at Petco Park last July 13.

It was a less effort affair this time. After needing a whopping 148 pitches to finish off the Padres last year, Lincecum needed only 113 pitches to finish them this time. He walked just one, struck out six and recorded 12 of his other 21 outs on ground balls.

The final out looked like this:

Quite a few pitchers have thrown two no-hitters, of course. But in collecting a second against the Padres, MLB says Lincecum joined a club that now contains only two members:

Now, as cool as this is, it also highlights the less awesome aspect of Lincecum's no-hitter. The Padres weren't a very good offensive team last year, but they're a historically awful offensive team this year.

There's a stat called wRC+ that measures total offensive value in runs as compared to league average (represented by an even 100). According to FanGraphs, the Padres have a team wRC+ of 75, making their offense 25 points worse than league average.

That's not just the worst in baseball this year. That puts them among the 30 worst offensive teams in the AL/NL era (since 1901). Hence, historically awful.

There's your warning not to get too carried away in thinking about where Lincecum goes from here. Even with his second no-hitter in the bag, he still only has a 4.42 ERA this season. And it's not like he'd been heating up, either, as he came into the game with a 6.85 ERA in June.

Point being: It's not a good idea to expect Lincecum's no-hitter to usher in a full-time return of his old powers. That's expecting too much.

If Lincecum's no-hitter proved anything, it's the same thing his first no-hitter proved: that he can still dip into his old powers on special occasions.

For all the things from Lincecum's Cy Young days that he doesn't have anymore, the one thing he still does have is a nasty collection of secondary pitches. There are still few pitchers out there with a slider/curveball/changeup mix as good as his.

We can tell that by noting how, according to, Lincecum is in the top 20 in swinging strikes on off-speed pitches this season. Further, Brooks Baseball says eight of Lincecum's 12 whiffs Wednesday afternoon came on his secondaries. Five of those whiffs finished off strikeouts.

Pretty good stuff for a guy who, according to Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle, didn't think his stuff was all that good:

He's probably right, but that's another point. Even when Lincecum's stuff isn't at its best, it's still really good.

And one thing Lincecum is doing with his off-speed stuff is trusting it more.

Per FanGraphs, his fastball usage fell to a career-low 50.0 percent last year and is down even lower at 47.3 percent this year. And just as only 61 of Lincecum's 148 pitches in his no-hitter last year were heaters, only 39 of his 113 pitches in this year's no-no were fastballs.

It's hard to maintain consistency when you're throwing so few fastballs, but that does help explain Lincecum's occasional flashes of dominance. Any team that's having a tough time hitting his secondaries is going to have a tough time hitting him, period.

And heaven help that team if Lincecum also has good fastball command that day.

Good fastball command is something Lincecum doesn't always have these days. Brooks Baseball has the strike percentages of both his four-seamer and sinker since the start of last season under 30 percent. That's...uh, not good.

But sometimes Lincecum's fastball command is there.

That was the case in last year's no-hitter, as he threw over 60 percent of his heaters for strikes. It was once again the case this afternoon, as he got strikes on about 60 percent of his heaters.

Which leads me to agree with this sentiment from Eno Sarris of FanGraphs:

He's right, you know. What made Lincecum's fastball so effective when he was winning Cy Young awards was its velocity more so than his command of it. Ever since all that zip evaporated, consistently substituting good command in for good velocity has been an ongoing struggle.

When Lincecum's able to do it, though, good luck.

Not long from now, I suspect that the general reality of today's Tim Lincecum will come back to the surface. He's bound to have a start that forces us all to remember that, oh yeah, it was the Padres he faced, and that his talent level is not what it used to be. Then we'll sigh and reminisce about what he used to be.

But he still has it in him, folks. We were just reminded of that, and it won't be the last reminder we get.


Note: Stats courtesy of unless otherwise noted/linked.


If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter

Read more MLB news on

Looking Inside the Numbers of MLB’s First Half of 2014

So, maybe not everybody has realized this yet, but the 2014 Major League Baseball season is already pretty much at the halfway point.

Yup. We've come that far. But rather than lament how we only have so much baseball left before a long, dark, cold winter, let's be more productive by taking stock of what's happened so far in 2014.

This being baseball, the best lessons and coolest tidbits are found in numbers. So that's where our focus is going to be, specifically on a dozen storylines involving super-interesting league and player trends.

Ready your calculators, spreadsheets and thinking caps, and follow me this way...

Note: Stats courtesy of and FanGraphs unless otherwise noted/linked and are current through play on Monday, June 23.

Begin Slideshow

Let the Buyer Beware on David Price Blockbuster Trade This July

The Tampa Bay Rays are likely going to trade David Price in July. And when they do, they're likely going to get some really good stuff in return.

But here's a warning for all interested parties: Be careful on this one, man. Price is still a very good pitcher, but neither his present nor his future is as bright as his past.

A few days after Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times wrote how it's becoming "increasingly obvious" that a Price trade is going to happen, ESPN's Buster Olney is saying rival officials believe the Rays are ready to deal "right now."

Olney cited additional sources who said the Rays "aren't actually close" to trading Price, mind you. Nonetheless, he is right in thinking that, thanks to the Rays' 31-47 record and Price's looming free agency after 2015, "the climate is right" for the 2012 American League Cy Young winner to be dealt.

As for the 28-year-old's value, the notion that Price has pitched better than his 3.81 ERA is already widespread. There are numbers that support this, starting with these from ESPN Stats & Info:

Price has earned his remarkable K/BB ratio. According to FanGraphs, he's throwing more first-pitch strikes, more pitches in the strike zone and getting more whiffs than he ever has as a starter.

And it's largely because of his K/BB ratio that Price fares a lot better in metrics that value strikeouts and walks when determining what a pitcher's ERA should be. Those include FIP, xFIP and SIERA, which agree that Price deserves better than a 3.81 ERA.

Via FanGraphs:

Ordinarily, I recommend taking these metrics' word for it when it comes to assessing a given pitcher's effectiveness. By focusing largely on strikeouts and walks, they focus on the two most important things a pitcher can control better than ERA does.

But Price is a special case. For all the stats that say he's perhaps never been harder to hit, a deeper dive says the exact opposite is the real truth.

We can begin with the obvious: Price's heat is not what it used to be. After a two-mile-per-hour drop in average fastball velocity in 2013, according to FanGraphs, Price's average velocity is down again to a career-low 92.9 miles per hour in 2014.

And while Olney noted that Price's velocity has gotten better, there's a catch to that. He did go from an average of 92.1 in March/April to 93.6 in May, but he is back down to 93.1 in June. Outside of May, he has indeed been working with career-worst fastball velocity in 2014.

It's to Price's credit that he's still been able to get whiffs with his hard stuff. In fact, there's a chart at Brooks Baseball that shows how all his pitches are experiencing increased whiff rates.

But there's also this one, which shows the rate at which Price's pitches have been turned into fly balls:

Focus on the black and gray lines. Those represent Price's four-seamer and sinker, otherwise known as the hard pitches he's using most often. Both have clearly been easier than usual to elevate in 2014.

This helps explain not only Price's diminished ground-ball habit, but his home run problem as well.

Price has already matched his 2012 and 2013 totals with 16 home runs allowed in 2014, and Brooks Baseball tells us seven homers of those homers have come on four-seamers and sinkers. This after giving up only six homers on those two pitches in all of 2013.

That Price's diminished velocity has something to do with this is a safe enough assumption. With his hard stuff generally coming across slower than before, hitters stand a better chance of squaring it up.

But that's not the only apparent problem that Price's diminished velocity is causing. It also appears to be impacting his offspeed stuff.

The whole point of offspeed pitches is to fool hitters. One way to do that is getting them off-balance. One thing that can do that job is good velocity differential between a pitcher's fast stuff and slow stuff.

And going off the velocity figures at FanGraphs, good velocity differential between his changeup and curveball and his heat is something Price is lacking in 2014:

The velocity differential between Price's heat and his changeup has never been smaller. The velocity differential between his heat and his curveball, meanwhile, is only slightly bigger than last year's low.

The lack of velocity differential between Price's heat and hook cost him last year, and it's costing him again in 2014:

Meanwhile, things aren't much better with Price's changeup:

Further compounding matters is that Price isn't putting these pitches out of reach. After accounting for just 7.5 percent of his pitches between 2009 and 2012, says changeups and curves inside the strike zone have accounted for 12.0 percent of Price's pitches in 2013 and 2014.

And so far this year, opponents are hitting Price's changeups and curves in the strike zone at a .383 clip with a .728 slugging percentage and seven home runs. He's thus being burned not just by diminished stuff, but by predictability as well.

[As a side note, by pal Jake Dal Porto has more on what's going on with Price's changeup over at Beyond the Box Score.]

All told, there's a pretty good picture of why Price's 3.81 ERA is actually an accurate measure of his effectiveness. His diminished velocity is a problem with both his hard stuff (obviously) and his slow stuff, and his over-willingness to throw his slow stuff in the strike zone isn't helping.

Now, granted, a pitcher who can maintain an ERA at 3.81 or thereabouts is hardly a lost cause. There are a lot of teams that could stand to add a guy like that, especially one who eats innings seemingly by the dozen. Whoever trades for Price will be acquiring an asset for a playoff push. No question about it.

Any team that makes a deal for Price expecting to get a true ace in return, however, is likely to be disappointed.

Convincing Price to throw more offspeed pitches outside the zone can be done, but his old velocity is likely only going to be there in spurts. There's no fixing that, and living with it will mean having to live with more hard-hit balls than Price gave up in his glory days.

And that's just this year. Remember, whoever trades for Price will have him in 2015, too. And at the rate he's going, the diminished talents he has now at age 28 are going to be even more diminished at age 29.

Buyers should be interested, but buyers should also beware.


Note: Stats courtesy of unless otherwise noted/linked.


If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter

Read more MLB news on

Chewing Tobacco Should Be MLB’s Next Outdated Tradition to Be Banned

Old traditions die hard in baseball, but it's to Major League Baseball's credit that it's been willing to kill off traditions that have outstayed their welcomes.

Like when MLB urged umpires to automatically eject head-hunting pitchers in 2001, or, more recently, when it placed a limited ban on home plate collisions. Both were baseball customs with deep roots, but MLB knew they had to go.

Now it should be smokeless tobacco's turn. Ballplayers have been dipping for as long as there have been ballplayers, but it's time for the league to kick the habit.

If anything, it's past time. By at least a week.

It was last week, of course, that we lost Hall of Famer and San Diego Padres legend Tony Gwynn far too soon. He passed away on June 16 at the age of 54 following a battle with salivary gland cancer.

The mark Gwynn made as a hitter—encapsulated by a .338 career average and eight batting titles—is the crown jewel of his legacy. He also made a profound mark as a person, as you could search far and wide for a negative testimony about Gwynn as a teammate, friend or coach and still come up empty.

But Gwynn's legacy shouldn't be complete just yet. His death has put baseball's smokeless tobacco problem in the spotlight, and it should be what ends the problem once and for all.

As ESPN's Tom Friend chronicled in 2011, Gwynn had a bad dipping habit his whole career. He experienced the first of several growths in his mouth in 1991 and began battling cancer in 2010.

“I haven’t discussed that with the doctors yet, but I’m thinking it’s related to dipping,” Gwynn told The San Diego Union-Tribune's Bill Center.

It couldn't be proven at the time that Gwynn was right. It still can't, as Matt McCarthy noted in a piece for Deadspin that dipping "hasn't actually been linked to the type of cancer that killed Tony Gwynn."

It is, nevertheless, certainly plausible that Gwynn's habit is what ultimately killed him. will vouch that smokeless tobacco has been linked to numerous types of cancer, including cancer of the mouth, tongue, cheek, gums and throat. And while the knowledge of the cancer risk that comes with dipping has grown, it's not anything new.

You can look back to 1986 and find the press wagging its finger at ballplayers for having such a self-destructive habit. Baseball eventually responded to mounting pressure by banning all tobacco in the minor leagues in 1993.

And then the league was given its first big cautionary tale.

That was Bill Tuttle. After a nearly 40-year dipping habit that included an 11-year run in the majors in the 1950s and 1960s, Tuttle required surgeries that, per The New York Times's Claire Smith, involved "removing his cancer-ridden right cheek, right jaw, teeth, taste buds as well as parts of his throat and neck."

Joined by his wife, Gloria, and former major leaguer Joe Garagiola, the (nearly faceless) Tuttle went on a tour of major league clubhouses to warn players of the dangers of dipping in 1996.

"Million-dollar players would come up with tears in their eyes and cans of tobacco in their hands and they would say, 'I want you to throw this away for me,' " Gloria Tuttle told The New York Times's Richard Goldstein in 1998.

That was also the year Tuttle died. Maybe that could have been baseball's cue to act. But with smokeless tobacco still ingrained in baseball's culture 16 years later, Tuttle's death obviously wasn't powerful enough to get the job done.

Tony Gwynn's death, however, could be.

In fact, MLB superstar Stephen Strasburg—who played for Gwynn at San Diego State University—has publicly announced, per's Bill Ladson, he is quitting the awful habit. It's a start, and hopefully the beginning of a positive trend.

There's no need to tell MLB that smokeless tobacco needs to go.

As noted by Seth Livingstone of USA Today, baseball was seeking a ban on dipping when the next collective bargaining agreement was being discussed in 2011. There was pressure coming from Washington, D.C., and Commissioner Bud Selig was on board.

"No. 1, watching guys spit in the dugouts is not exactly a great thing to watch," Selig said. "But, more importantly, if you knew the health consequences, they're huge."

Selig obviously was (and still is) right on the second point. He's right on the first point, too. For all the beautiful sights baseball can offer, a player spitting out a stream of sickly brown goop isn't one of them.

But it's not just an ugly sight. It's been noted—for example, by Maury Brown in a piece for Forbes—that the league is worried about kids picking up dipping from watching baseball. It may sound like an eyeroll-worthy "Won't somebody please think of the children!" concern, but it is nonetheless a valid concern.

"I was one of those kids that picked it up based on seeing ballplayers do it," Strasburg told The Washington Post in 2011. "It's not a good thing, and I don't want to represent myself like that."

Note Strasburg's choice of words. Not "a kid," but "one of those kids."

And yet no ban happened in 2011. The league pushed, but the MLB Players Association pushed back. Per The Associated Press, via, the final compromise only called for players not to keep chewing tobacco in their pockets, and also for them not to use it in pre- and postgame interviews or at team functions.

Rather than pushed out of the game, dipping was merely pushed out of sight.

Then-union head Michael Weiner, who also passed away too young last November, said in 2011 the players felt that banning dipping "was not appropriate under the circumstances."

When John Shea of the San Francisco Chronicle checked in with current union chief Tony Clark, he found that the union is still content to focus on "player education" in regards to smokeless tobacco rather than a ban.

No wonder. There are players who, like Strasburg, aren't proud of their dipping habits. But there's also an attitude of defiance among others.

San Francisco Giants reliever Jeremy Affeldt summed this attitude up well to Seth Livingstone in 2011:

Come on, that's a joke...I know there's a lot of young and impressionable minds out there, and we have a responsibility, but still. Whatever we do is not going to keep smokeless tobacco from being sold. Does it cause bodily harm? Yes. But we are grown men. They have to make their own decision.

No doubt it was this stance that propped up the union's push against the tobacco ban in 2011. With the next CBA due up for 2016, the best hope of getting a tobacco ban is this stance softening.

With Gwynn's passing, that could happen.

Arizona Diamondbacks reliever and former San Diego State Aztec Addison Reed had an extreme reaction to his old coach's passing, as Steve Gilbert of reported Reed threw out all the chew that he had and quit on the spot.

That makes it at least one person in uniform who's been hit hard enough by Gwynn's death to stop dipping. Elsewhere, others have been hit hard enough to at least look in the mirror.

“This is more about Tony Gwynn and it’s a sad situation,” Detroit Tigers center fielder Austin Jackson told The Detroit News. “But it definitely brings some awareness.”

And Chicago Cubs reliever James Russell, speaking to the Chicago Sun-Times: "Anytime you see something like that, it definitely makes you second-guess your choice of using tobacco or not.”

And Nationals manager Matt Williams, speaking to The Washington Post: “Nobody really knows yes or no or maybe. But of course it does [make you think]. It hits home with a lot of folks, and it’s been part of our sport for a long time. But it certainly does make you think.”

All this means there's hope. The defiant attitude of players toward chewing tobacco got in the way of the ban MLB wanted in 2011. In the wake of Gwynn's death, that attitude may be softening.

Smokeless tobacco has been a baseball staple for so long that it's hard to picture the game without it. But given its sheer unsightliness and the health hazard it presents to current and future players, the time has come for baseball to accept a life without it as soon as possible.

Nobody knows for sure if it's what Gwynn would want, but it's certainly how baseball can do right by him.


If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter

Read more MLB news on

Chris Davis Needs His Walk-Off Homer to Be Major 2014 Turning Point

Baltimore Orioles slugger Chris Davis entered Monday's action in need of a big hit in the worst way but in a lousy position to get one. It's not so easy to hit from the bench, you know.

Fortunately for Davis, baseball has that one rule that allows managers to use pinch hitters.

The Orioles entered the bottom of the ninth inning of Monday's contest trailing the Chicago White Sox by a score of 4-3. With two on and one out, Buck Showalter called on Davis to pinch hit for Delmon Young against White Sox closer Ronald Belisario.

After working the count to 3-2, Davis caught hold of a pitch and sent it out to right field for a three-run, walk-off homer that gave the Orioles a 6-4 win and set the crowd at Oriole Park at Camden Yards on a roar.

It looked like this:

The win was Baltimore's third in a row to run its record to 40-35, and it allowed the Orioles to remain 1.5 games behind the Toronto Blue Jays in the AL East.

In all, not a bad day at the office for a guy who began the game on the bench. Showalter started Steve Pearce at first base instead, which made sense given that Pearce has been hot while Davis, well, hasn't.

Pearce entered Monday's game on a string of five straight two-hit games and with a 1.164 OPS in June. As for Davis—aka the guy who launched 53 homers with a 1.004 OPS in 2013—he entered with a .565 OPS over his last 25 games, a cold stretch that dropped his 2014 OPS from .892 down to .749.

Put simply: Davis had been sucking.

Hey, his words. As told to Eduardo A. Encina of The Baltimore Sun:

The hope now, obviously, is that Davis' big walk-off homer will be a turning point.

That's what the Orioles need it to be, as the "Crush" Davis they've come to know would certainly be useful in keeping pace in the tightly packed AL East. Bit it's also true for Davis himself, as he's a guy who needs to keep alive the notion that he's deserving of a big payday with free agency looming after 2015.

As for whether Davis' big homer will be a turning point, the best we can do is say "Maybe" in an optimistic tone.

One reason for optimism is that you never know when a big hit is going to give a guy a confidence boost. And going off what Davis had to say about benching, it sure sounds like he needed one of those.

A slightly more tangible reason for optimism is that Davis just might have fixed something with his approach at the plate when he sent Belisario's pitch sailing through the Baltimore night. This has to do with the kind of pitch it was. 

Per the naked eye and Brooks Baseball, it was a slider that Davis hit out. Sliders are from the breaking ball genus, and that's one that Davis has been having a ton of trouble with in 2014.

Here, look at this:

Regarding what Davis was against breaking balls before 2013, Grantland's Jonah Keri put it well when he called Davis a "real-life Pedro Cerrano." He couldn't hit breaking balls.

Until he all of a sudden could, of course. But after mashing them in 2013, Davis has once again had a very tough time with them in 2014. And the problem was especially bad in his 25-game cold stretch, as he hit .042 against breakers with a .167 slugging percentage.

Keri's article had a couple of GIFs in it that showed how Davis' struggles against breaking pitches could be chalked up to poor pitch recognition and mechanics. Most noticeable of all was how he couldn't keep his hips closed. His front hip would fly open and a wild swing would ensue.

That's part of the beauty of Davis' dinger Monday night. Check out the position of his hips as the pitch neared home plate:

Yeah, that's what we want to see on breaking balls. No wonder Davis hit it out.

There is one catch, though.

The pitch that Davis hit out was clocked at 87 miles per hour. According to, Davis owns a .288 average against pitches clocked at 87 or higher this season. That's compared to an .098 average on pitches clocked at 86 and slower. So rather than "complete victory," a better term for his dinger would be "progress."

Still, progress will do for, um, progress. And if progress begets more progress, Davis could soon become one of the American League's most dangerous hitters once again and make a lot of people happy in doing so.

The Orioles would be happy because the return of "Crush" Davis is a potential game-changer in their postseason chase. For example, you can look to how, according to FanGraphs, they wasted a 3.67 ERA over the last 30 days by pairing it with middle-of-the-road offense and think, "Man, what if?"

Perhaps we'll get a chance to find out over the next 30 days, and beyond.

Then there's Davis himself. There are no guarantees that the Orioles will rush to sign him to an extension if he finishes 2014 on a strong note, but you never know. The Orioles could finally be free of Nick Markakis' $66 million contract, and Nelson Cruz departing would render them in need to lock up a power bat for the future.

To that end, who would be better than the guy who hit 53 homers and came alive to save their bacon in 2014?

For at least a moment on Monday night, Chris Davis was "Crush" Davis again. If he's able to stay "Crush" Davis, there's much to be gained.


Note: Stats courtesy of, unless otherwise noted/linked.


If you want to talk baseball, hit me up on Twitter.

Follow zachrymer on Twitter

Read more MLB news on